WritersWeekly.com is one of the oldest and most respected sites on freelance writing. It has been published continuously since 1997. It’s part of the BookLocker.com, Inc. family of businesses, which includes POD and ebook publisher.
My experience with this service was very frustrating. The promises made upfront were misleading, and the actual support I received was slow and unhelpful. It felt like they were more interested in making money than actually helping. I would not recommend relying on WritersWeekly if you want professional or dependable results.
I was extremely disappointed to learn that this company is connected to BookLocker.com. They sell the same services across multiple platforms, and worse, they post fake articles on other sites to make themselves look reputable. It feels very deceptive and manipulative, almost like a scam targeting unsuspecting authors. Their practices make it clear that profit comes before honesty or supporting writers. I would strongly advise authors to avoid them and look for trustworthy alternatives instead.
All reviews and experiences about WritersWeekly are the subjective opinions of those who compose and submit them | The profile owner is responsible for the contents of this page |
Profile active since 01/19/2026 | Last update: 01/20/2026
| Report profile
Grow your business now by claiming your business profile and get full control over your business information and unlock powerful tools to engage with customers.
Benefits of claiming your profile:
Respond to customer reviews directly
Update business information and hours
Access analytics and customers insights
Submit a report to ProvenExpert
Quality assurance is the top priority of ProvenExpert's terms of use and evaluation guidelines.
However, should you feel that a review is in violation of our guidelines, you can submit a request to have the review assessed by the ProvenExpert quality assurance team by using the following contact form.
Send email to reviewer
* Required fields
You have already posted this review on . Posting again might create duplication.
Continue?